back

Frank Nyitray

Hi,

I saw your article on OCAP where you mentioned Undercoverkity. His real name is Frank Nyitray:

He also uses the nickname "Brother Wolf" and brother, is he a wolf. He is a "disability activist" and was the self-crowned king of the gimps at Occupy as head of the "disability caucus". He ran it like a little despot though and would browbeat anyone who disagreed with him. He can't be trusted. If he thinks you're against him he rats you out to the police. 

He used to be in the army but busted himself up in a car accident and has been living off a nice disability pension from them ever since. 

He's a "gimp pimp" if you like. At Ryerson a few years ago he was head of "RyeAccess" and got a nice salary but was fired when he was caught feathering his nest. Of course, since it's the RSU, everyone was feathering their own nest anyway so they used incompetence as an excuse. He then sued everyone to high heaven and took them to the human rights commission - and lost - which is really hard to do these days. You have to be a special kind of stupid not to be able to win a case in front of the Human Rights Tribunal.

See http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0/0/ontario/human-rights-tribunal-of-ontario/2012/12/13/nyitray-v-ryerson-university-students-union-2012-hrto-2336.shtml

(I have it here. tr)

Anyway, he's always trying to get other gimps to join him in some scheme or another but he's the only one who ever seems to make money off of it and if you complain he threatens to turn you over to one of his cop buddies (he claims to be in with the cops). 

A real slimeball this one. Make sure you steer clear of him.

Web owner's comment: My thanks to the submiter of this article. Just the kind of thing I want to receive; concise, factual, organized, readable, and not based just on ideological affiliation or personal vendetta. tr

xxx

"Wilderness of Mirrors"

It was fairly predictible. As soon as I published something about a member of the right wing poliitical whack bat network, it gets denounced as misinformation from the opposites. The solution is to have nothing to do with anyone with an ideological cause, who thinks he or she is a cadre of some such network.

If you want to work in political activism, find a non ideological group to work with, one with an aim that the general public can be brought to support, and which is always what it appears to be.

So look what came over the net today, from "Ryan Elson";

I am wondering how you can comment as follows:

"Just the kind of thing I want to receive; concise, factual, organized, readable, and not based just on ideological affiliation or personal vendetta."

These are the points of conjecture that I find rather offensive as they are unsubstantiated by the evidence given:

"He's a 'gimp pimp' if you like. At Ryerson a few years ago he was head of 'RyeAccess' and got a nice salary but was fired when he was caught feathering his nest. Of course, since it's the RSU, everyone was feathering their own nest anyway so they used incompetence as an excuse. He then sued everyone to high heaven and took them to the human rights commission - and lost - which is really hard to do these days. You have to be a special kind of stupid not to be able to win a case in front of the Human Rights Tribunal."

"incompentence as an excuse" -- shouldn't people be fired for "reasons" not "excuses"?

The human rights pdf that was linked mentions on page 14 of a settlement that was made, of course "settlement" does not come across as a "loss".  Furthermore, on the page 18 there is a ruling of "deferral" and not dismissal.  Dismissal is a loss, deferral is something pending other matters. I see that some complaints were dismissed, but for some pretty rotten reasons employing statute of limitations in regards to human rights complaints, of the unreasonable time frame of 1 year, when such matters could be continuous and ongoing for a span much longer than merely a single year -- as a result certain aspects could not be taken into consideration.  That special kind of stupid, is most certainly a biased opinion, considering human rights cases are at heart quite often very difficult to prove.

"Anyway, he's always trying to get other gimps to join him in some scheme or another but he's the only one who ever seems to make money off of it and if you complain he threatens to turn you over to one of his cop buddies (he claims to be in with the cops)."

This claim seems odd -- no mention of this "scheme", no evidence supporting this claim.  It sounds like a smear and one utilized in the vendetta of the social justice and lefty communist quacks tied into RSU.

"A real slimeball this one. Make sure you steer clear of him."

Oh, no vendetta at all. ORLY!

People are suggesting that this has the stink of the hand of Andy Lehrer, I would imagine it is a very distinct possibility.

Going through your list of "bad organizations", I can't help but to notice that both Frank's and Greg Renouf's enemies happen to be amongst most of those organizations and tend to share multiple affiliations.

You don't think it's a coincidence that such people would take notice and attempt to smear them through your website?  You do know all of these org's are latched in to the "social justice collective" and have guidelines for each of their "cells" to collaborate amongst one another right?  Have you looked into the background of the person whom submitted the article (or let me guess, it was anonymous or a fake name, so as to avoid liability)?

Cheers, Ryan

To which I sez;

I wonder what Nyitray, alias "undercover kity" was doing hanging around with these "scoail justice collective" types in the first place. Was he undercover there, too. I wonder where all the right wing kooks have their own undercovers?

As for the mesage being anonymous, most of what I get is anonymous. It fits reasonably well with other stuff I know and can deduce from Nyitray's mentality by his writings. It is not from Lehrer, his writing style is different.

But as I said above, the first rule of any serious organization is to simply refuse to deal with people with hidden agendas. You do not have multip;le connections; you find one group and work with it.

And of course, the worst and most destructive kind of fanatic of all is the one who wants to work with everyone, draw in everyone, try to find a common cause with everyone. In other words, the codependant personality. This is the mentality that really makes constructive action impossible.

But now who is this Ryan Elson? Read and weep. tr

xxx